Experiments

731 experiments · 731 complete

Foundations
13/13
01 First-Principles Capacity Computation 02 Non-Circular Temperature Extraction 03 Capacity-Entropy Connection 410 V2.410: Universality of α_s — Independent Lattice Verification 414 V2.414: Ratio Universality — Is R = |δ|/(6α) Scheme-Independent? 415 V2.415: Ratio Universality — Is R = |δ|/α Scheme-Independent? 416 V2.416: α_s from Per-Channel Asymptotics 417 V2.417: Ratio Universality Test — R = |δ|/α is NOT Scheme-Universal 418 V2.418: Informed α Extraction — Fixing δ Does NOT Help 419 V2.419: Scaling Function for α_s — From Numerics to Analytics 420 V2.420: Per-Channel Scaling Function F(x) = n²·d²S_l for α_s 421 V2.421: Per-Channel Scaling Function — F(x) is NOT Scheme-Universal 424 V2.424: The Trace Anomaly Selects α_s — A Consistency Argument
Slope Theorem
3/3
Metric Recovery
4/4
Field Equations
3/3
Discrete Emergence
4/4
Hardening & Validation
24/24
18 Lattice QFT Capacity Extraction 19 Correct Quantum Fisher Information on Causal Sets 20 Discrete Entanglement Entropy from SJ Vacuum 21 V2.21: Large-N Slope Law Convergence with Correct QFI — Report 22 V2.22: Background Independence Audit — Report 23 V2.23: Central Charge Convergence to Large N — Report 24 V2.24: Interacting Field Feasibility — Report 25 V2.25: Quantum Corrections from Capacity — Report 26 V2.26: 2+1D Discrete Pipeline — Report 27 V2.27: Black Hole Information from Capacity Channels — Report 28 V2.28: Falsifiable Predictions from the Capacity Framework — Report 29 V2.29: Cross-Dimensional Consistency of Capacity Predictions 30 V2.30: Entropy Extraction Method Robustness 31 V2.31: Finite-Size Scaling & Continuum Extrapolation 32 V2.32: Modified Dispersion Relation from Finite Encoding Time — Report 33 V2.33: Universality of Quantum Corrections & Unified G_eff 34 V2.34: Background-Independent SJ Construction via Benincasa-Dowker d'Alembertian 35 V2.35: 3+1D Discrete Capacity Pipeline 176 V2.176: Route Uniqueness — Why the Clausius Derivation of Λ Is Not One of Many 177 V2.177: The Graviton Hilbert Space from Cosmological Data 178 V2.178: The Interaction Correction Budget 179 V2.179: The Clausius Verification — Does the First Law Demand Λ = |δ|/(6α)? 180 V2.180: The Falsifiability Gauntlet — Can We Kill This Theory? 434 V2.434: Mass Decoupling of R — Does the Prediction Survive Heavy Fields?
Deep Numerical Tests
22/22
36 V2.36: Resolving the Firewall Problem via Channel Degradability — Report 37 V2.37: Quantitative BEC Analog Gravity Predictions — Report 38 V2.38: Exact Bekenstein-Hawking Coefficient S = A/(4G) — Report 39 V2.39: The Hierarchy Problem — Why Gravity Is Weak — Report 40 V2.40: The Cosmological Constant Problem — Report 41 V2.41: Integrated Convergence Pipeline — Report 42 V2.42: Forward Jacobson Derivation — Report 43 V2.43: Sparse BD d'Alembertian + Background-Free Pipeline — Report 44 V2.44: Dynamical Causal Set Growth — Report 45 V2.45: 3+1D Area-Law Derivation of G = 1/(4*alpha*c) — Report 46 V2.46: Dimension-Dependent Coefficient and Updated Predictions — Report 47 V2.47: Convergence Comparison — Report 48 V2.48: Sorkin-Yazdi Entropy Fix + Log S-A Fit — Report 49 V2.49: Fix Discrete Entropy UV Divergence + BD Ricci Divergence 50 V2.50: Complete Pipeline — V2.19 Gamma* + Unruh T + Fixed-n Entropy + Calibrated BD 51 V2.51b: KMS Temperature Extraction + Improved Entropy 52 V2.52: Gamma* Fix + Pipeline Cleanup 53 V2.53: Non-Circular Temperature Derivation 54 V2.54: N-Convergence Analysis + De Sitter Curved Spacetime 55 V2.55: Improved Temperature Extraction + Entropy Diagnostic 266 V2.266: UV Sensitivity of the Cosmological Constant — Stencil Universality 269 V2.269: Cubic Lattice Cross-Check — Independent Geometry Confirms α_s
Cosmological Prediction
33/33
56 V2.56: Pointwise BD Calibration Fixes R_kk at Large N 57 V2.57: 4 Genuinely Independent Measurements — 4/4 at N=1000, N=3000, and N=5000 58 V2.58: Steinhauer Data Confrontation — Report 59 V2.59: Cosmological Constant from 3+1D Entanglement Entropy — Report 60 V2.60: Periodic BCs + Derivative Extraction — Report 61 V2.61: Finite-Difference Delta Extraction — Report 62 V2.62: Route A Theoretical Derivation — Report 63 V2.63: Information-Theoretic Proof of Lambda — Report 64 V2.64: Bianchi Identity Proof — Closing the Gap — Report 65 V2.65: Cube vs Sphere Geometry Correction — Report 66 V2.66: Cube Vertex Correction & Lambda_bare = 0 — Report 67 Confirming delta = -1/90 via Spherical Decomposition 68 De Sitter Self-Consistency Loop 69 Curvature-Corrected Delta/Alpha Extraction 70 Standard Model Species Counting for Self-Consistency 71 Dirac Fermion Alpha — Doublers, Convergence, and Physical R_SM 72 Angular Cutoff Methodology — Global vs Proportional for All Species 73 Delta Extraction with Global Cutoff 74 V2.74: Area-Law Coefficient Convergence to C -> infinity 75 V2.75: Mass Dependence of the Log Coefficient delta 76 V2.76: Wilson Fermion Convergence & Scale-Dependent Self-Consistency 87 Non-Equilibrium d_iS Correction to Lambda 88 V2.88: Graviton (Spin-2) Entanglement Entropy 89 Self-Consistent Lambda from R(mu) Crossover 90 De Sitter Horizon Entanglement Entropy 91 RG Flow Beta Functions for Entropy Coefficients 92 Self-Consistency Factor Analysis 423 V2.423: Lambda Through Cosmic Phase Transitions 426 V2.426: CMB Quadrupole Suppression from Horizon Entanglement 431 V2.431: Hubble Tension Resolution from the Entanglement Framework 432 V2.432: Neutrino Mass Constraint from Fixed Ω_Λ 440 V2.440: Zero-Parameter H₀ — The Hubble Constant from SM Fields + BBN + Geometry 456 V2.456: Bayesian Evidence — Savage-Dickey Density Ratio
Thermodynamic Uniqueness
10/10
Closing the Lambda Gap
119/119
93 V2.93: Alpha Decoupling at Cosmological Mass-Radius 94 V2.94: Omega_Lambda Correction to Self-Consistency 95 V2.95: Non-Equilibrium First Law with Log-Corrected Entropy 96 V2.96: Viscous Horizon Corrections 97 V2.97: Scale-Dependent Lambda and w(z) Prediction 98 V2.98: Complete Lambda Prediction — Synthesis of All Corrections 99 V2.99: Analytic alpha(m) from Heat Kernel 100 V2.100: Goldilocks Alpha Interpretation 101 V2.101: Symbolic Verification of the Self-Consistency Factor 102 V2.102: Corrected Graviton Entanglement Entropy 103 V2.103: Graviton Alpha from Scalar Mode Decomposition 104 V2.104: Dirac Area Coefficient via Alternative Regularizations 105 V2.105: The 4D Trace Anomaly Identity in de Sitter 106 V2.106: Closing the Lambda Gap — Systematic Uncertainties and Graviton Edge Modes 136 V2.136: Renyi Entanglement Entropy Spectrum 157 V2.157: Direct 3D Lattice Verification of the Fermion Area-Law Coefficient 158 V2.158: Graviton DOF Counting and the Cosmological Constant 159 V2.159: Field Content Sensitivity — Uniqueness of the Cosmological Constant Prediction 160 V2.160: Mass Decoupling and the Running Cosmological Constant 161 V2.161: Precision Error Budget — Is the Ω_Λ Match Statistically Significant? 162 V2.162: Predicting Particle Content from the Cosmological Constant 164 V2.164: The (a,c) Anomaly Decomposition — Why the Prediction Isn't Numerology 166 V2.166: Deriving the Graviton DOF Count from Canonical Gravity and Edge Modes 167 V2.167: The Complete Theoretical Error Budget 168 V2.168: Why Λ_bare = 0 — The Entanglement Equilibrium Argument 169 V2.169: Is It Numerology? — Systematic Exclusion of Alternative Formulas 181 V2.181: The Analytic Alpha Conjecture 182 V2.182: The Spectral Proof — High-Precision Test of α_s = 1/(24√π) 183 V2.183: The Rényi Spectrum — Multi-Order Verification 184 V2.184: The Double Limit — Ultra-Precision α via (C,n)→(∞,∞) Extrapolation 185 V2.185: The Precision Frontier — Pushing α to Its Limits 187 V2.187: The Vacuum-Entanglement Identity — Spectral Proof that Λ_bare = 0 188 V2.188: The Constraint Funnel — Physical Uniqueness of the Ω_Λ Formula 189 V2.189: Three Routes to f=6 — Independent Derivations of the Cosmological Constant 190 V2.190: BSM Exclusions from the Cosmological Constant 191 V2.191: The Complete QFT Landscape — How Unique Is the Standard Model's Cosmological Constant? 192 V2.192: Precision Delta Extraction — The Log-Coefficient Bottleneck 194 V2.194: Fermion Entanglement Entropy — Lattice Verification Attempt and Analytic Resolution 195 V2.195: Higher-Spin Entanglement Entropy on a Sphere 196 V2.196: Regulator Independence of the EE Log Coefficient 197 V2.197: Per-Channel Delta Spectrum 198 V2.198: Richardson Extrapolation 199 V2.199: C-Cutoff Convergence 200 V2.200: Beyond Von Neumann — Renyi Entropy and Entanglement Capacity as Independent Cross-Checks of Omega_Lambda 201 V2.201: Resolving the Graviton — Edge-Mode Counting and the Precision Frontier of Lambda 202 V2.202: Monte Carlo Lambda — Full Uncertainty Quantification with Graviton Model Selection 203 V2.203: The Conformal Mode — Settling n_eff = 9 vs 10 from First Principles 204 V2.204: No Volume Law — Lambda_bare = 0 from Entanglement Structure 205 V2.205: De Sitter Self-Consistency — Lambda Prediction Survives Its Own Curved Background 206 V2.206: Coupled Fields and Anomaly Additivity — Do Interactions Shift Lambda? 207 V2.207: The Spin-Dependent Anomaly Gap 208 V2.208: Modified Friedmann Evolution — Full Cosmological History from Entanglement Entropy 209 V2.209: Can Entanglement Dark Energy Cross the Phantom Divide? 210 V2.210: Neutrino Mass and Nature from the Cosmological Constant 211 V2.211: Zero-Parameter Cosmological Scorecard 212 V2.212: Entanglement Entropy on S^3 213 V2.213: Thermal Corrections to the Entanglement Self-Consistency Ratio 218 V2.218: Graviton Trace Anomaly from the Lattice 219 V2.219: Precision Test of the 50% Rule 220 V2.220: Continuum Extrapolation of delta via Richardson Method 221 V2.221: The Self-Consistent Cutoff — Mapping R(C) 222 V2.222: BSM Constraints from the Cosmological Constant 223 V2.223: Renyi Entropy Spectrum of the Entanglement Horizon 224 V2.224: Mass Independence of the Log Coefficient 225 V2.225: Angular Momentum Decomposition — Explaining the 50% Rule 226 V2.226: Precision Monopole Test — The 50% Rule Is NOT Exactly 1/2 227 V2.227: Entanglement Capacity — A Second Independent Observable 229 V2.229: The Gauge-Fermion Core — Lambda Without the Graviton Ambiguity 230 V2.230: The Entanglement Spectrum — Mode-by-Mode Origin of alpha_s 231 V2.231: Analytic Scaling Function — Identifying f(x) to prove alpha_s = 1/(24*sqrt(pi)) 232 V2.232: Dimensional Dependence of alpha_s — Does 1/(24*sqrt(pi)) Generalize? 233 V2.233: Radial Entanglement Profile — Spatial Origin of the Cosmological Constant 234 V2.234: The Boundary Mode Formula — Toward Proving alpha_s = 1/(24*sqrt(pi)) 235 V2.235: Renyi Entropy Spectrum — The Cosmological Constant is Von Neumann Specific 236 V2.236: The Continuum Limit — Why alpha_s Cannot Be Derived from Continuum Theory 237 V2.237: The Entanglement First Law on the Lattice 238 V2.238: Entanglement Entropy in the de Sitter Static Patch 239 V2.239: Wilson Fermion Entanglement — Lattice Verification of alpha_Dirac 240 V2.240: Precision R Ratio — Direct Lattice Verification of |delta|/(6*alpha) 241 V2.241: Modular Thermality — Testing the Foundation of Jacobson's Derivation 242 V2.242: Strong Subadditivity & Markov Gap — Quantum Information Foundation of Jacobson's Derivation 243 V2.243: Mass Deformation & Entanglement RG Flow 246 V2.246: Precision Trace Anomaly from Entanglement — Closing the Self-Consistency Loop 247 V2.247: Renyi Spectrum of Lambda — von Neumann Uniquely Selects Omega_Lambda 248 V2.248: Interaction Corrections to Entanglement Lambda — Are Free Fields Enough? 271 V2.271: Spin Dependence of α — Centrifugal Shift Has No Effect 283 V2.283: Functional Completeness of S(n) — The Hidden Perimeter Term 286 V2.286: QNEC 4-Parameter Consistency — α Robust, δ Below Cutoff Oscillation 287 V2.287: Spectral Measure Decomposition — What Determines α_s? 288 V2.288: The Spectral Measure at the Entangling Surface 289 V2.289: Per-Mode Entanglement-Energy Duality and QNEC Channel Anatomy 290 V2.290: Heat Kernel Representation of α_s 291 V2.291: Boundary Resolvent and Continued Fraction for α_s 292 V2.292: The Williamson Correction Factor 293 V2.293: Golden Ratio Universality Test 351 V2.351: Graviton Mode Counting from First Principles 375 V2.375: The Gauge-Matter Barometer — Ω_Λ as a Measure of the SM Field Balance 393 V2.393: First-Principles Graviton Entanglement Entropy on the Srednicki Lattice 395 V2.395: Edge Mode Derivation — Why n_grav = 10 and n_vector = 2 397 V2.397: Constrained Phase Space Entanglement — Edge Modes on the Lattice 399 V2.399: Constrained Phase Space — Geometric vs Gauss Edge Modes on Lattice 400 V2.400: Interaction Corrections to the Area Coefficient — Closing the 0.4σ Gap 403 V2.403: Phase-Transition Invariance — Lambda Unchanged Through EW/QCD Transitions 427 V2.427: Graviton Precision Prediction — Narrowing the Λ/Λ_obs Window 433 V2.433: Edge Mode Area Law — Do Constraints Create Area-Law Edge Modes? 437 V2.437: Full SM Spectrum Lattice R — End-to-End Verification 450 V2.450: Graviton DOF from First Principles — Why n_grav = 10 452 V2.452: Precision α_s — Is Ω_Λ = 149√π/384 Exact? 458 V2.458: Spin-Dependent Area Coefficient — α is Universal Across Spins 459 V2.459: Ratio Convergence — UV Protection of Ω_Λ 460 V2.460: Spin-Dependent Area Coefficient — α Universal to <0.02% Across Spins 554 V2.554: Quantitative Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem 556 V2.556: Graviton Mode Count from the Cosmological Constant 572 V2.572: Graviton Entanglement Anatomy — First-Principles Derivation of n_grav = 10 597 V2.597: Precision Error Budget for the Ω_Λ Prediction 609 V2.609: High-Precision α_s — Is It Exactly 1/(24√π)? 627 V2.627: Interaction Correction to the Lambda Prediction 686 V2.686: Running Cosmological Constant — The Entanglement Scale 688 V2.688: Running Cosmological Constant — 1-Loop SM Correction to Λ(μ)
Black Hole Entropy
19/19
107 Schwarzschild Lattice and Alpha Universality 108 Entanglement Spectrum and Hawking Temperature 109 The Page Curve from Lattice Entanglement 110 SM Log Correction to Black Hole Entropy 111 Universality of Delta Across Geometries 112 Unification — Dark Energy and Black Holes from S = alpha*A + delta*ln(A) 113 Scale-Matching Analysis of Hawking Temperature 114 Systematic M -> 0 Delta Extrapolation 348 V2.348: Black Hole Entropy Log Correction — The Quantum Gravity Fingerprint 369 V2.369: Black Hole Remnant Mass from Entanglement Entropy 404 V2.404: BH vs Cosmological Horizon — Log Coefficient Split 405 V2.405: Geometry Independence of the Trace Anomaly — Lattice Verification 448 V2.448: Joint Multi-Observable Constraint on Graviton Mode Count 449 V2.449: BH Log Coefficient — Framework vs. Every QG Approach 557 V2.557: BH Entropy Log Correction — Spin Independence and QG Discrimination 628 V2.628: Black Hole Log Correction — Exact SM Prediction vs Competing Approaches 632 V2.632: Lattice Verification of Weyl Correction to BH Log Coefficient 635 V2.635: Kerr BH Log Correction — Topological Protection Against Spin 638 V2.638: Schwarzschild-de Sitter Two-Horizon Interpolation
BSM from Lambda
36/36
115 V2.115: BSM Spectroscopy from the Cosmological Constant 116 V2.116: The Spectral Proof — Mode-by-Mode Entanglement-Energy Identity 117 V2.117: Mass Deformation Test — Robustness of α and the Λ Prediction 118 V2.118: Direct R Convergence — Precision Test at Ultra-High Cutoff 119 V2.119: The Double Limit — α(N,C) → α_∞ as N→∞, C→∞ 120 V2.120: The Graviton Entanglement Fraction — Updated BSM Landscape 121 V2.121: Lattice Verification of delta_vector and delta_graviton via d3S 122 V2.122: 3D Lattice Test of α_Weyl/α_scalar = 2 123 V2.123: Renyi Entropy Self-Consistency — Does R_n Depend on the Renyi Index? 124 V2.124: The Spectrum Constraint — How Special is the SM for Λ? 125 V2.125: The Generation Prediction — Why 3 Families from R = Ω_Λ 126 V2.126: BSM Exclusion Bounds — What R = Ω_Λ Rules Out 127 V2.127: Prediction Precision — Error Budget, H₀, and Falsification Tests 128 V2.128: The Gauge-Fermion Miracle — Ω_Λ from Pure Gauge Dynamics 129 V2.129: Graviton Self-Screening — Parameter-Free Λ from δ\_EE/δ\_EA 130 V2.130: Mass Independence of δ — Proving w = −1 Exactly 131 V2.131: The Double-Counting Proof — Vacuum Energy = Entanglement Entropy 132 V2.132: Why N_c = 3 — The Cosmological Constant Selects QCD 133 V2.133: The Three Numbers — SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) Derived from Ω_Λ 134 V2.134: Significance of the SM-Λ Prediction 135 V2.135: Rigorous Statistical Assessment — Correcting the 5σ Claim 137 V2.137: Black Hole Entropy Log Corrections — The Graviton Edge Mode Prediction 138 V2.138: DESI Dark Energy Equation of State — Falsification Test 139 V2.139: Hubble Tension Diagnostic — Entanglement Framework Prediction 140 V2.140: Dark Matter Exclusion from the Entanglement Lambda Prediction 141 V2.141: Effective Dark Energy Equation of State from Horizon Thermodynamics 186 V2.186: The Gauge Theory Landscape — Can Ω_Λ Derive the Standard Model? 228 V2.228: The Standard Model from Lambda — Algebraic Proof of Uniqueness 245 V2.245: Entanglement Lambda as a BSM Particle Detector — Full Concordance Exclusions 325 V2.325: Species-Dependence Curve & Black Hole Log Correction 331 V2.331: Dark Matter Constraints from the Cosmological Constant 356 V2.356: Neutrino Mass Constraints from Lambda 384 V2.384: Dual (Λ, γ_BH) Particle Detector 388 V2.388: Species-Dependence Falsification Map 443 V2.443: Why Three Generations? — Ω_Λ Selects N_gen = 3 446 V2.446: Species-Dependence Curve — Λ as a Dark Sector Detector
Dynamical Selection
300/300
326 V2.326: Neutrino-Graviton Joint Constraint — Why N_ν = 3 327 V2.327: Lambda Constancy Through Phase Transitions — Resolution of the Vacuum Energy Problem 328 V2.328: Graviton Spectroscopy — Ω_Λ Measures the Graviton Mode Count 329 V2.329: Lambda as a Topological Invariant — Mass Independence & Exclusion Map 330 V2.330: Massive Scalar Delta — Does Mass Modify the Trace Anomaly? 332 V2.332: Zero-Parameter Cosmological Concordance 333 V2.333: Bayesian Model Selection — Framework vs LCDM 334 V2.334: BH Thermodynamics Confrontation — Log Correction Consequences 336 V2.336: SM Uniqueness from Omega_Lambda 337 V2.337: Graviton Edge Mode Derivation — Why n_grav = 10 Closes the Lambda Gap 338 V2.338: Information Content of the Cosmological Constant 339 V2.339: Thermal Stability of R 340 V2.340: Anomaly Cancellation x Lambda — Double Selection of the SM 341 V2.341: Bayesian Model Comparison — Framework (0 params) vs ΛCDM (1 param) 342 V2.342: Anomaly x Lambda Double Selection 343 V2.343: Framework vs w0waCDM — The DESI Confrontation 344 V2.344: Framework vs w₀wₐCDM — The DESI Confrontation 345 V2.345: Lambda Through Cosmic Phase Transitions — The Thermal History Test 346 V2.346: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Prediction 347 V2.347: Lambda Through Cosmic Phase Transitions — Zero Fine-Tuning 349 V2.349: CMB Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement — A Smoking Gun Test 350 V2.350: Graviton Precision Prediction — Pinning Lambda to a Single Number 352 V2.352: Precision Omega_Lambda Error Budget — The Final Number 353 V2.353: Multi-Observable Quantum Gravity Concordance 354 V2.354: Cosmic Parameters from One Number — How the SM Determines the Expansion History 355 V2.355: Hubble Tension Filter — What the Framework Says About H_0 357 V2.357: The N_eff-Lambda Joint Constraint Curve 358 V2.358: DESI Year 1 w0-wa Confrontation 359 V2.359: UV vs IR Field Counting — Why the Full SM is Required 360 V2.360: Graviton Mode Counting — Λ Prediction vs GW Propagation 363 V2.363: Multi-Probe Zero-Parameter Concordance 364 V2.364: Dark Energy Equation of State Confrontation 367 V2.367: Phase Transition Invariance — Λ is a Topological Invariant 370 V2.370: Joint N_eff–Ω_Λ Constraint from Entanglement Dark Energy 381 V2.381: Framework vs Anthropic Landscape — Which Explanation of Ω_Λ Wins? 383 V2.383: Graviton Mass from Lambda — Entanglement vs Massive Gravity 386 V2.386: The Coincidence Problem Dissolved — Why Ω_Λ ≈ 0.7 Is Not Fine-Tuned 389 V2.389: Species-Dependence Falsification Map — 5 Unique Testable Predictions 390 V2.390: Entanglement Framework vs de Sitter Swampland 392 V2.392: Edge Mode Selection — Why Spacetime Gauge ≠ Internal Gauge 394 V2.394: Graviton Entanglement Lattice — SVT Decomposition Excludes TT-Only 398 V2.398: Constrained Phase Space — First Lattice Edge Mode from Gauge Constraints 401 V2.401: Species-Dependence Precision Curve 402 V2.402: Phase-Transition Invariance of the Cosmological Constant 406 V2.406: Correlated Lambda × gamma_BH Fingerprint 407 V2.407: Gauge Group Selection from Lambda — How Special Is the Standard Model? 408 V2.408: Correlated Λ × γ_BH Fingerprint — Two Predictions from One Input 409 V2.409: Cosmological Parameters from Lambda — The Framework's H_0 Prediction 413 V2.413: Full Cosmological Predictions — One Input, All Observables 422 V2.422: Species-Dependence Curve — Λ/Λ_obs as a Function of Field Content 425 V2.425: Graviton Precision Prediction — Narrowing the Λ/Λ_obs Window 429 V2.429: Electroweak Phase Transition — Lambda Invariance 430 V2.430: Joint Ω_Λ–N_eff Constraint — The Two-Observable Test 435 V2.435: Falsification Roadmap — Joint Significance and Decision Timeline 447 V2.447: Equation of State Test — w = -1 as a Theorem, Not an Assumption 453 V2.453: Precision Concordance — 28 Predictions from Zero Parameters 454 V2.454: DESI Covariance BAO Analysis + Falsification Forecast 455 V2.455: BAO Cosmic Variance — Framework Survival Probability Under DESI 461 V2.461: w₀-wₐ Survival Monte Carlo — 4.1σ Reduces to 2.7σ 463 V2.463: Lambda Through the Electroweak Phase Transition 464 V2.464: N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Constraint — The Cross-Probe Prediction 465 V2.465: Hubble Tension Resolution Filter 466 V2.466: Framework vs Swampland de Sitter Conjecture 467 V2.467: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Λ — Breaking the Degeneracy 468 V2.468: GW Standard Siren Forecast 469 V2.469: Neutrino Mass Ordering Forecast 471 V2.471: Alpha Universality from Omega_Lambda 472 V2.472: DESI BAO Bin-by-Bin Diagnostic 473 V2.473: CMB Low-ℓ ISW Signature from Fixed Ω_Λ 474 V2.474: Precision Species-Dependence Forecast 475 V2.475: Theoretical Error Budget — How Precisely Does the Framework Predict Ω_Λ? 476 V2.476: Graviton Mode Derivation — Why n=10 and Not n=2? 477 V2.477: Quantitative Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem 478 V2.478: Multi-Probe Graviton Spectroscopy 479 V2.479: Theory Comparison Matrix 480 V2.480: Falsification Decision Tree 481 V2.481: Falsification Decision Tree — 7 Tests, P(survive)=93%, Decisive by 2029 482 V2.482: Falsification Decision Tree 483 V2.483: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo 484 V2.484: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo — P(survive) = 99%, not 93% 485 V2.485: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo 486 V2.486: Comprehensive Zero-Parameter Concordance 487 V2.487: Honest Zero-Parameter Concordance 488 V2.488: Concordance Robustness — Sensitivity Analysis 489 V2.489: Joint N_eff–Ω_Λ Exclusion Contour 490 V2.490: DESI Dark Energy Deconstruction 491 V2.491: Running Vacuum Confrontation — Framework (ν=0) vs Running Vacuum Model 492 V2.492: Hubble Tension Resolution from Graviton Entanglement 493 V2.493: Species-Dependence Curve — Lambda as a Particle Counter 494 V2.494: Growth of Structure — μ=Σ=1 from Derived GR 495 V2.495: Analog BH Log Correction — The Lab-Testable QG Distinguisher 496 V2.496: Inflation from Entanglement — de Sitter as Graviton Self-Consistency 497 V2.497: Neutrino Mass as S₈ Resolution — A Sharp Null Result 498 V2.498: Dark Matter Identity from Dark Energy 499 V2.499: Confinement Invariance — Lambda Cannot Tell Quarks from Hadrons 500 V2.500: S₈ After Baryonic Feedback — The Framework's Last Escape Route Works 501 V2.501: Overconstrained Zero-Parameter Concordance 502 V2.502: Coincidence Problem Resolution — Why Ω_Λ/Ω_m ~ O(1) 503 V2.503: EW Phase Transition Λ Invariance — Goldstone Theorem Protects R 504 V2.504: Expansion History Multi-Probe Test 505 V2.505: Particle Colliders as Dark Energy Experiments 506 V2.506: DESI w₀wₐ Bayesian Model Selection — Framework vs CPL 507 V2.507: Black Hole Log Correction as a Quantum Gravity Discriminator 508 V2.508: D=4 Dimensional Selection from the Entanglement Sign Rule 509 V2.509: Hubble Tension — Framework's Sharp Prediction 510 V2.510: CMB Low Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement 511 V2.511: The Cosmological Constant Problem Dissolved 512 V2.512: Predictive Information Content 513 V2.513: Lambda Invariance Through the Electroweak Phase Transition 514 V2.514: Graviton Mass Bound from the Cosmological Constant 515 V2.515: Joint N_eff–Lambda Exclusion Surface 516 V2.516: Zero-Parameter Expansion History from Entanglement Entropy 517 V2.517: Vacuum Energy vs Trace Anomaly — Why the Higgs Doesn't Ruin Λ 518 V2.518: Structure Growth from Lambda — sigma_8, S_8, f*sigma_8 from Particle Physics 519 V2.519: DESI Year 1 Confrontation — The Framework's Toughest Test 521 V2.521: Next-Decade Falsification Forecast 522 V2.522: Why Three Generations — The SM is Uniquely Selected by Ω_Λ 523 V2.523: Landscape Scan — How Special is the SM's R = 0.6877? 524 V2.524: Graviton Conformal Mode — Does it Contribute to Entanglement? 525 V2.525: Bayesian Model Showdown — Framework vs ΛCDM vs w₀wₐCDM 526 V2.526: Λ_bare Posterior — Does the Data Demand Λ_bare = 0? 527 V2.527: Neutrino Mass Prediction from Lambda 528 V2.528: CMB Tension Anatomy — Where Does the 0.44% Gap Live? 529 V2.529: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 530 V2.530: CMB Tension Anatomy — Which Observable Drives Ω_Λ? 531 V2.531: Dual Observable QG Discriminator — Joint (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Prediction 532 V2.532: DESI BAO Anatomy — Does the Framework Explain the w≠-1 Anomaly? 533 V2.533: Black Hole Entropy Log Correction Spectrum — Charge Dependence from SM Trace Anomaly 534 V2.534: Phase Transition Lambda Tower — Why 10^55 Fine-Tuning Dissolves 536 V2.536: Lambda Through Cosmic History — 120 Digits of Fine-Tuning Dissolved 537 V2.537: Dark Energy Equation of State — Framework w=-1 vs DESI w₀wₐ 538 V2.538: Species-Dependence Landscape — SM Uniquely Selected 539 V2.539: Vacuum Energy Null Projection — Why ρ_vac Doesn't Source Λ 540 V2.540: Bayesian Model Comparison — Framework vs ΛCDM 543 V2.543: Electroweak Phase Transition Consistency Test 550 V2.550: Dark Energy as a Universal Particle Detector 551 V2.551: Grand Concordance — Combined Evidence Across All Cosmological Probes 552 V2.552: Pre-Data Predictions — Falsifiable Predictions for DESI DR2, Euclid, CMB-S4, LSST 553 V2.553: Joint Lambda-BH Fingerprint — One Trace Anomaly, Two Predictions 555 V2.555: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 558 V2.558: The Hubble Tension as a Framework Prediction 559 V2.559: Growth Rate Confrontation — Does fσ8(z) Confirm w = -1? 560 V2.560: Cosmic Tension Anatomy — One Prediction vs Five Tensions 561 V2.561: Neutrino Mass from the Cosmological Constant 562 V2.562: Multi-Probe Bayesian Evidence Synthesis 564 V2.564: Observable Consistency Web — 15 Predictions from One Number 565 V2.565: BAO Tomographic Λ Reconstruction 566 V2.566: EW/QCD Phase Transition Invariance of Λ 567 V2.567: DESI Survival Monte Carlo — Framework Survives at 17% p-value 568 V2.568: Growth Rate fσ8 — Structure Formation from Λ 569 V2.569: BAO Survival Monte Carlo 570 V2.570: Type Ia Supernovae Distance Modulus — The Original Dark Energy Probe 571 V2.571: Pre-Registered Predictions for DESI DR3 and CMB-S4 573 V2.573: Lambda Through the Electroweak Phase Transition — The Fine-Tuning Thermometer 574 V2.574: Cosmological Evidence for Quantum Gravity 575 V2.575: CMB Power Spectrum — Zero-Parameter Confrontation with Planck 576 V2.576: The Species-Dependence Atlas — Complete BSM Landscape for Ω_Λ 577 V2.577: Joint Graviton Mode Count from All Cosmological Probes 578 V2.578: CMB as Arbiter — Framework (w=-1) vs DESI Best-Fit (w₀wₐ) 581 V2.581: Monte Carlo Coincidence Test — How Special Is the SM's Ω_Λ? 582 V2.582: Coincidence Monte Carlo — Is the SM Match to Ω_Λ Special? 583 V2.583: Generation Selection — The Cosmological Constant Predicts N_gen = 3 584 V2.584: Physical Viability Filter — From 2.3σ to 2.6σ 585 V2.585: Physical Viability Filter — SM Among Real Theories 586 V2.586: Physical Viability Filter — SM is 1 of 3 Survivors Among 316 Viable Theories 587 V2.587: Multi-Probe Joint Bayesian Evidence — CMB + BAO + SNe 589 V2.589: Angular Anatomy of the Cosmological Constant 590 V2.590: Phase Transition Invariance — The 55-Digit Problem Resolved 591 V2.591: The N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Prediction Plane 592 V2.592: N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Prediction Plane — Unique Falsifiable Test 593 V2.593: BSM Joint Fingerprint — The (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Prediction Plane 594 V2.594: The Complete Prediction Scorecard — Framework vs. All Approaches 595 V2.595: The Decisive Test — Framework vs DESI w₀wₐ 598 V2.598: No-Go Theorem — New Particles Cannot Resolve the Hubble Tension 601 V2.601: Monte Carlo Survival Analysis — When Will We Know? 603 V2.603: Inverse Cosmological Spectroscopy — Ω_Λ as a Particle Physics Observable 604 V2.604: Omega_Lambda as a Particle Physics Observable — Inverse Cosmological Spectroscopy 605 V2.605: H0 Prediction Confrontation with the Distance Ladder Landscape 608 V2.608: EW Phase Transition — Lambda Invariance 610 V2.610: Joint Species-Dependence + BH Log Correction — QG Fingerprint 611 V2.611: Pre-Registered Predictions for 2027–2035 612 V2.612: CMB Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement Spectrum 613 V2.613: Neutrino Nature Prediction — Majorana vs Dirac 614 V2.614: CMB Acoustic Scale Precision Test 615 V2.615: Dark Energy Equation of State — DESI Y1 Confrontation 616 V2.616: Next-Decade Decision Tree — When Will We Know? 617 V2.617: Smoking Gun Joint Evidence 619 V2.619: Graviton Mode Count Derivation — The α-δ Asymmetry 620 V2.620: Cosmological Selection of the Standard Model — Why 3 Generations 621 V2.621: Generation Selection from Lambda 623 V2.623: EW Phase Transition Invariance — Ω_Λ Is the Same at Every Epoch 624 V2.624: SM Uniqueness — Exhaustive Field Content Scan 631 V2.631: Species-Dependence Atlas — The Framework's Unique Fingerprint 633 V2.633: Per-Mode Dark Energy Structure and CMB Low-l Implications 634 V2.634: Per-Particle Dark Energy Budget 636 V2.636: Growth Rate f·σ₈(z) — Zero-Parameter Prediction vs DESI DR1 637 V2.637: The QCD Sector as the Anchor of Dark Energy 639 V2.639: Hubble Tension Anatomy — H₀ Diagnosis Within the Framework 640 V2.640: SM Uniqueness from Omega_Lambda + Anomaly Cancellation 641 V2.641: Lambda Counts Colors — Ω_Λ Determines N_c = 3 642 V2.642: End-to-End Lattice Verification of R = 149√π/384 643 V2.643: Phase Transition Invariance — Why Lambda Doesn't Jump 645 V2.645: SM Uniqueness from the Full BSM Landscape 646 V2.646: Precision Double-Limit R = 149sqrt(pi)/384 647 V2.647: Equation of State from Entanglement — Why w = -1 is Exact 648 V2.648: Delta Mass-Independence via Differential Method 649 V2.649: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 650 V2.650: Mass Invariance of the Trace Anomaly Delta 651 V2.651: BH Entropy Log Correction Staircase — Mass-Dependent Species Activation 652 V2.652: N_eff–Ω_Λ Falsification Corridor 653 V2.653: Two Predictions, Zero Parameters — the (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Overconstrained Test 654 V2.654: Bayesian BAO Model Comparison — Framework vs ΛCDM vs w₀waCDM 655 V2.655: One Number Predicts Everything 656 V2.656: Neutrino Mass from Lambda — Breaking the Ω_Λ–Σm_ν Degeneracy 657 V2.657: BAO-SN Tension Diagnostic — Why w₀waCDM Is Overfitting 658 V2.658: The Coincidence Problem — Resolved or Reframed? 659 V2.659: Unitarity Requires Dark Energy — The a-Theorem Connection 660 V2.660: Unitarity Requires Dark Energy — The Cosmological Constant Selects N_gen = 3 661 V2.661: GUT Gauge Group Selection — The SM and Trinification Survive, All Standard GUTs Excluded 662 V2.662: Global Evidence Ratio — The Definitive Statistical Assessment 663 V2.663: Global Evidence Ratio — Bayesian Framework vs ΛCDM 664 V2.664: Global Evidence Ratio — Framework BIC-Preferred Over LCDM 665 V2.665: Global Evidence Ratio — Framework Preferred Over LCDM by BF=50 666 V2.666: Precision Interaction Correction — Closing the 0.44% Gap 667 V2.667: Precision Interaction Correction — δ Exact, α Corrected by SM Couplings 668 V2.668: Dark Matter Particle Exclusion from Ω_Λ 669 V2.669: Dark Energy Budget — Which SM Fields Source Ω_Λ? 670 V2.670: BAO Survival Monte Carlo — Framework Ranks Top 28% of Random Cosmologies 671 V2.671: Lambda Phase Transition Invariance — The Goldstone Shield 672 V2.672: Lambda Phase Transition Invariance — The Goldstone Shield 673 V2.673: Species-Dependence Curve — The Particle-Cosmology Bridge 675 V2.675: Species-Dependence Curve — The Particle-Cosmology Bridge 676 V2.676: Precision Prediction Card — The Framework's Final Answer 677 V2.677: Precision Prediction Card — The Framework's Final Answer 678 V2.678: DESI w₀wₐ Model Comparison — Is Evolving Dark Energy Justified? 679 V2.679: SM Selection from the QFT Landscape 680 V2.680: Growth Rate Confrontation — fσ₈(z) as Independent w=-1 Test 681 V2.681: Growth Rate Confrontation — fσ₈(z) Independently Prefers w=-1 683 V2.683: Supernova Distance Modulus Confrontation — The Third Pillar 684 V2.684: CMB Acoustic Scale Test — Shift Parameter R at -0.05σ 687 V2.687: Precision BSM Exclusion Map — Lambda as a Particle Detector 689 V2.689: Joint (N_eff, Ω_Λ) Prediction Corridor — The Two-Observable Smoking Gun 690 V2.690: Black Hole Log Correction — The Quantum Gravity Discriminant 691 V2.691: The Dual Observable Test — One Number Rules BH Physics and Cosmology 692 V2.692: Dual Observable Test — One Number Rules BH Physics and Cosmology 693 V2.693: The Cosmological Constant Problem — Mass-Independence of Delta 694 V2.694: DESI Bayes Factor — Zero Parameters vs w₀wₐCDM 695 V2.695: Per-Species Entanglement Spectrum — The Rainbow Curve 696 V2.696: Precision Prediction Error Budget — How Sharp Is R? 697 V2.697: Graviton Edge Modes — Why n_grav = 10 and What It Means 698 V2.698: Complete Derived Parameters — H₀, σ₈, S₈ from Zero Parameters 699 V2.699: Graviton Mode Count from the Lattice — n_grav = 10 Without Cosmology 700 V2.700: Derived Parameters — Framework vs LCDM on Cosmological Tensions 701 V2.701: Full Cosmological Concordance — Zero Parameters vs ALL Data 702 V2.702: Joint Significance of Six Predictions from One Formula 703 V2.703: Does the Framework Absorb DESI's Evolving Dark Energy Signal? 704 V2.704: Information-Theoretic Model Selection — The Occam Razor 705 V2.705: Gauge Theory Landscape Scan — How Special Is the SM? 706 V2.706: Species-Dependence Curve — Lambda as a Function of Particle Content 707 V2.707: Tension Anatomy — Where the 2.9σ Actually Comes From 708 V2.708: EW Phase Transition Lambda Invariance 709 V2.709: Euclid/CMB-S4 Discrimination Forecast — When Will We Know? 710 V2.710: PBH Hawking Radiation Spectral Fingerprint 711 V2.711: BH Entropy Log Correction as Quantum Gravity Discriminant 712 V2.712: Graviton Mode Count Derivation — n_grav = D(D+1)/2 = 10 713 V2.713: Graviton Screening Precision — What Euclid Will Test 714 V2.714: Omega_Lambda–N_eff Joint Prediction Curve 715 V2.715: The Ω_Λ–N_eff Joint Curve — the Smoking Gun Prediction 716 V2.716: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — The Inverted Hierarchy 717 V2.717: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — the Inverted Hierarchy 718 V2.718: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — the Inverted Hierarchy 719 V2.719: The Spin Balance — Why Omega_Lambda ~ 0.7 Is Not a Coincidence 720 V2.720: The Spin Balance — Why Omega_Lambda ~ 0.7 Is Not a Coincidence 721 V2.721: w = -1 Exactly — the Framework's Most Dangerous Prediction 722 V2.722: Global Consistency Scorecard — One Number for the Framework 723 V2.723: Bayesian Model Selection — ln(BF) = +10.7 vs CPL (pre-DESI) 724 V2.724: The (a,c) Decomposition — Two Predictions from One Anomaly 724 V2.724: The (a,c) Decomposition — Two Predictions from One Anomaly 727 V2.727: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Fingerprint 728 V2.728: Multi-Probe BSM Exclusion Map 729 V2.729: CMB Low-Multipole Prediction — Zero-Parameter Entanglement Cosmology 730 V2.730: BH Entropy Log Correction — Two Predictions, Zero Parameters 731 V2.731: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Lambda 732 V2.732: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Lambda — Breaking the OL-mnu Degeneracy 733 V2.733: Dark Energy Selects Three Generations 734 V2.734: EW Phase Transition Lambda Invariance — The CC Problem Solved 735 V2.735: Dual Observable BSM Exclusion Map — Two Predictions, Zero Parameters 744 V2.744: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Prediction 751 V2.751: BH Entropy Log Correction — Quantum Gravity Fingerprint 752 V2.752: GUT Incompatibility Theorem — Lambda Forbids Gauge Unification 753 V2.753: BH Entropy Log Correction — Quantum Gravity Rosetta Stone 756 V2.756: Framework-Allowed Gravitational Wave Window at LISA 757 V2.757: BSM Phase Space Topology — Dark Matter Census 758 V2.758: Horizon Entanglement Spectroscopy — CMB Quadrupole Bound 759 V2.759: Axion-Lambda Connection — Three Problems, One Particle 760 V2.760: Zero-Parameter Bayesian Showdown — Framework vs ΛCDM at the Precision Frontier 768 V2.768: Black Hole Entropy Log Correction — The Standard Model Prediction 769 V2.769: Joint (N_eff, Ω_Λ) Constraint — The Particle Physics ↔ Cosmology Bridge 781 V2.781: EW Vacuum Energy Invariance — The 10^55 Fine-Tuning Test 783 V2.783: Graviton Entanglement Hierarchy — Why n=10 and How Euclid Will Test It
Falsifiability & External Tests
300/300
326 V2.326: Neutrino-Graviton Joint Constraint — Why N_ν = 3 327 V2.327: Lambda Constancy Through Phase Transitions — Resolution of the Vacuum Energy Problem 328 V2.328: Graviton Spectroscopy — Ω_Λ Measures the Graviton Mode Count 329 V2.329: Lambda as a Topological Invariant — Mass Independence & Exclusion Map 330 V2.330: Massive Scalar Delta — Does Mass Modify the Trace Anomaly? 332 V2.332: Zero-Parameter Cosmological Concordance 333 V2.333: Bayesian Model Selection — Framework vs LCDM 334 V2.334: BH Thermodynamics Confrontation — Log Correction Consequences 336 V2.336: SM Uniqueness from Omega_Lambda 337 V2.337: Graviton Edge Mode Derivation — Why n_grav = 10 Closes the Lambda Gap 338 V2.338: Information Content of the Cosmological Constant 339 V2.339: Thermal Stability of R 340 V2.340: Anomaly Cancellation x Lambda — Double Selection of the SM 341 V2.341: Bayesian Model Comparison — Framework (0 params) vs ΛCDM (1 param) 342 V2.342: Anomaly x Lambda Double Selection 343 V2.343: Framework vs w0waCDM — The DESI Confrontation 344 V2.344: Framework vs w₀wₐCDM — The DESI Confrontation 345 V2.345: Lambda Through Cosmic Phase Transitions — The Thermal History Test 346 V2.346: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Prediction 347 V2.347: Lambda Through Cosmic Phase Transitions — Zero Fine-Tuning 349 V2.349: CMB Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement — A Smoking Gun Test 350 V2.350: Graviton Precision Prediction — Pinning Lambda to a Single Number 352 V2.352: Precision Omega_Lambda Error Budget — The Final Number 353 V2.353: Multi-Observable Quantum Gravity Concordance 354 V2.354: Cosmic Parameters from One Number — How the SM Determines the Expansion History 355 V2.355: Hubble Tension Filter — What the Framework Says About H_0 357 V2.357: The N_eff-Lambda Joint Constraint Curve 358 V2.358: DESI Year 1 w0-wa Confrontation 359 V2.359: UV vs IR Field Counting — Why the Full SM is Required 360 V2.360: Graviton Mode Counting — Λ Prediction vs GW Propagation 363 V2.363: Multi-Probe Zero-Parameter Concordance 364 V2.364: Dark Energy Equation of State Confrontation 367 V2.367: Phase Transition Invariance — Λ is a Topological Invariant 370 V2.370: Joint N_eff–Ω_Λ Constraint from Entanglement Dark Energy 381 V2.381: Framework vs Anthropic Landscape — Which Explanation of Ω_Λ Wins? 383 V2.383: Graviton Mass from Lambda — Entanglement vs Massive Gravity 386 V2.386: The Coincidence Problem Dissolved — Why Ω_Λ ≈ 0.7 Is Not Fine-Tuned 389 V2.389: Species-Dependence Falsification Map — 5 Unique Testable Predictions 390 V2.390: Entanglement Framework vs de Sitter Swampland 392 V2.392: Edge Mode Selection — Why Spacetime Gauge ≠ Internal Gauge 394 V2.394: Graviton Entanglement Lattice — SVT Decomposition Excludes TT-Only 398 V2.398: Constrained Phase Space — First Lattice Edge Mode from Gauge Constraints 401 V2.401: Species-Dependence Precision Curve 402 V2.402: Phase-Transition Invariance of the Cosmological Constant 406 V2.406: Correlated Lambda × gamma_BH Fingerprint 407 V2.407: Gauge Group Selection from Lambda — How Special Is the Standard Model? 408 V2.408: Correlated Λ × γ_BH Fingerprint — Two Predictions from One Input 409 V2.409: Cosmological Parameters from Lambda — The Framework's H_0 Prediction 413 V2.413: Full Cosmological Predictions — One Input, All Observables 422 V2.422: Species-Dependence Curve — Λ/Λ_obs as a Function of Field Content 425 V2.425: Graviton Precision Prediction — Narrowing the Λ/Λ_obs Window 429 V2.429: Electroweak Phase Transition — Lambda Invariance 430 V2.430: Joint Ω_Λ–N_eff Constraint — The Two-Observable Test 435 V2.435: Falsification Roadmap — Joint Significance and Decision Timeline 447 V2.447: Equation of State Test — w = -1 as a Theorem, Not an Assumption 453 V2.453: Precision Concordance — 28 Predictions from Zero Parameters 454 V2.454: DESI Covariance BAO Analysis + Falsification Forecast 455 V2.455: BAO Cosmic Variance — Framework Survival Probability Under DESI 461 V2.461: w₀-wₐ Survival Monte Carlo — 4.1σ Reduces to 2.7σ 463 V2.463: Lambda Through the Electroweak Phase Transition 464 V2.464: N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Constraint — The Cross-Probe Prediction 465 V2.465: Hubble Tension Resolution Filter 466 V2.466: Framework vs Swampland de Sitter Conjecture 467 V2.467: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Λ — Breaking the Degeneracy 468 V2.468: GW Standard Siren Forecast 469 V2.469: Neutrino Mass Ordering Forecast 471 V2.471: Alpha Universality from Omega_Lambda 472 V2.472: DESI BAO Bin-by-Bin Diagnostic 473 V2.473: CMB Low-ℓ ISW Signature from Fixed Ω_Λ 474 V2.474: Precision Species-Dependence Forecast 475 V2.475: Theoretical Error Budget — How Precisely Does the Framework Predict Ω_Λ? 476 V2.476: Graviton Mode Derivation — Why n=10 and Not n=2? 477 V2.477: Quantitative Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem 478 V2.478: Multi-Probe Graviton Spectroscopy 479 V2.479: Theory Comparison Matrix 480 V2.480: Falsification Decision Tree 481 V2.481: Falsification Decision Tree — 7 Tests, P(survive)=93%, Decisive by 2029 482 V2.482: Falsification Decision Tree 483 V2.483: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo 484 V2.484: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo — P(survive) = 99%, not 93% 485 V2.485: Correlated Survival Monte Carlo 486 V2.486: Comprehensive Zero-Parameter Concordance 487 V2.487: Honest Zero-Parameter Concordance 488 V2.488: Concordance Robustness — Sensitivity Analysis 489 V2.489: Joint N_eff–Ω_Λ Exclusion Contour 490 V2.490: DESI Dark Energy Deconstruction 491 V2.491: Running Vacuum Confrontation — Framework (ν=0) vs Running Vacuum Model 492 V2.492: Hubble Tension Resolution from Graviton Entanglement 493 V2.493: Species-Dependence Curve — Lambda as a Particle Counter 494 V2.494: Growth of Structure — μ=Σ=1 from Derived GR 495 V2.495: Analog BH Log Correction — The Lab-Testable QG Distinguisher 496 V2.496: Inflation from Entanglement — de Sitter as Graviton Self-Consistency 497 V2.497: Neutrino Mass as S₈ Resolution — A Sharp Null Result 498 V2.498: Dark Matter Identity from Dark Energy 499 V2.499: Confinement Invariance — Lambda Cannot Tell Quarks from Hadrons 500 V2.500: S₈ After Baryonic Feedback — The Framework's Last Escape Route Works 501 V2.501: Overconstrained Zero-Parameter Concordance 502 V2.502: Coincidence Problem Resolution — Why Ω_Λ/Ω_m ~ O(1) 503 V2.503: EW Phase Transition Λ Invariance — Goldstone Theorem Protects R 504 V2.504: Expansion History Multi-Probe Test 505 V2.505: Particle Colliders as Dark Energy Experiments 506 V2.506: DESI w₀wₐ Bayesian Model Selection — Framework vs CPL 507 V2.507: Black Hole Log Correction as a Quantum Gravity Discriminator 508 V2.508: D=4 Dimensional Selection from the Entanglement Sign Rule 509 V2.509: Hubble Tension — Framework's Sharp Prediction 510 V2.510: CMB Low Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement 511 V2.511: The Cosmological Constant Problem Dissolved 512 V2.512: Predictive Information Content 513 V2.513: Lambda Invariance Through the Electroweak Phase Transition 514 V2.514: Graviton Mass Bound from the Cosmological Constant 515 V2.515: Joint N_eff–Lambda Exclusion Surface 516 V2.516: Zero-Parameter Expansion History from Entanglement Entropy 517 V2.517: Vacuum Energy vs Trace Anomaly — Why the Higgs Doesn't Ruin Λ 518 V2.518: Structure Growth from Lambda — sigma_8, S_8, f*sigma_8 from Particle Physics 519 V2.519: DESI Year 1 Confrontation — The Framework's Toughest Test 521 V2.521: Next-Decade Falsification Forecast 522 V2.522: Why Three Generations — The SM is Uniquely Selected by Ω_Λ 523 V2.523: Landscape Scan — How Special is the SM's R = 0.6877? 524 V2.524: Graviton Conformal Mode — Does it Contribute to Entanglement? 525 V2.525: Bayesian Model Showdown — Framework vs ΛCDM vs w₀wₐCDM 526 V2.526: Λ_bare Posterior — Does the Data Demand Λ_bare = 0? 527 V2.527: Neutrino Mass Prediction from Lambda 528 V2.528: CMB Tension Anatomy — Where Does the 0.44% Gap Live? 529 V2.529: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 530 V2.530: CMB Tension Anatomy — Which Observable Drives Ω_Λ? 531 V2.531: Dual Observable QG Discriminator — Joint (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Prediction 532 V2.532: DESI BAO Anatomy — Does the Framework Explain the w≠-1 Anomaly? 533 V2.533: Black Hole Entropy Log Correction Spectrum — Charge Dependence from SM Trace Anomaly 534 V2.534: Phase Transition Lambda Tower — Why 10^55 Fine-Tuning Dissolves 536 V2.536: Lambda Through Cosmic History — 120 Digits of Fine-Tuning Dissolved 537 V2.537: Dark Energy Equation of State — Framework w=-1 vs DESI w₀wₐ 538 V2.538: Species-Dependence Landscape — SM Uniquely Selected 539 V2.539: Vacuum Energy Null Projection — Why ρ_vac Doesn't Source Λ 540 V2.540: Bayesian Model Comparison — Framework vs ΛCDM 543 V2.543: Electroweak Phase Transition Consistency Test 550 V2.550: Dark Energy as a Universal Particle Detector 551 V2.551: Grand Concordance — Combined Evidence Across All Cosmological Probes 552 V2.552: Pre-Data Predictions — Falsifiable Predictions for DESI DR2, Euclid, CMB-S4, LSST 553 V2.553: Joint Lambda-BH Fingerprint — One Trace Anomaly, Two Predictions 555 V2.555: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 558 V2.558: The Hubble Tension as a Framework Prediction 559 V2.559: Growth Rate Confrontation — Does fσ8(z) Confirm w = -1? 560 V2.560: Cosmic Tension Anatomy — One Prediction vs Five Tensions 561 V2.561: Neutrino Mass from the Cosmological Constant 562 V2.562: Multi-Probe Bayesian Evidence Synthesis 564 V2.564: Observable Consistency Web — 15 Predictions from One Number 565 V2.565: BAO Tomographic Λ Reconstruction 566 V2.566: EW/QCD Phase Transition Invariance of Λ 567 V2.567: DESI Survival Monte Carlo — Framework Survives at 17% p-value 568 V2.568: Growth Rate fσ8 — Structure Formation from Λ 569 V2.569: BAO Survival Monte Carlo 570 V2.570: Type Ia Supernovae Distance Modulus — The Original Dark Energy Probe 571 V2.571: Pre-Registered Predictions for DESI DR3 and CMB-S4 573 V2.573: Lambda Through the Electroweak Phase Transition — The Fine-Tuning Thermometer 574 V2.574: Cosmological Evidence for Quantum Gravity 575 V2.575: CMB Power Spectrum — Zero-Parameter Confrontation with Planck 576 V2.576: The Species-Dependence Atlas — Complete BSM Landscape for Ω_Λ 577 V2.577: Joint Graviton Mode Count from All Cosmological Probes 578 V2.578: CMB as Arbiter — Framework (w=-1) vs DESI Best-Fit (w₀wₐ) 581 V2.581: Monte Carlo Coincidence Test — How Special Is the SM's Ω_Λ? 582 V2.582: Coincidence Monte Carlo — Is the SM Match to Ω_Λ Special? 583 V2.583: Generation Selection — The Cosmological Constant Predicts N_gen = 3 584 V2.584: Physical Viability Filter — From 2.3σ to 2.6σ 585 V2.585: Physical Viability Filter — SM Among Real Theories 586 V2.586: Physical Viability Filter — SM is 1 of 3 Survivors Among 316 Viable Theories 587 V2.587: Multi-Probe Joint Bayesian Evidence — CMB + BAO + SNe 589 V2.589: Angular Anatomy of the Cosmological Constant 590 V2.590: Phase Transition Invariance — The 55-Digit Problem Resolved 591 V2.591: The N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Prediction Plane 592 V2.592: N_eff–Ω_Λ Joint Prediction Plane — Unique Falsifiable Test 593 V2.593: BSM Joint Fingerprint — The (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Prediction Plane 594 V2.594: The Complete Prediction Scorecard — Framework vs. All Approaches 595 V2.595: The Decisive Test — Framework vs DESI w₀wₐ 598 V2.598: No-Go Theorem — New Particles Cannot Resolve the Hubble Tension 601 V2.601: Monte Carlo Survival Analysis — When Will We Know? 603 V2.603: Inverse Cosmological Spectroscopy — Ω_Λ as a Particle Physics Observable 604 V2.604: Omega_Lambda as a Particle Physics Observable — Inverse Cosmological Spectroscopy 605 V2.605: H0 Prediction Confrontation with the Distance Ladder Landscape 608 V2.608: EW Phase Transition — Lambda Invariance 610 V2.610: Joint Species-Dependence + BH Log Correction — QG Fingerprint 611 V2.611: Pre-Registered Predictions for 2027–2035 612 V2.612: CMB Quadrupole from Horizon Entanglement Spectrum 613 V2.613: Neutrino Nature Prediction — Majorana vs Dirac 614 V2.614: CMB Acoustic Scale Precision Test 615 V2.615: Dark Energy Equation of State — DESI Y1 Confrontation 616 V2.616: Next-Decade Decision Tree — When Will We Know? 617 V2.617: Smoking Gun Joint Evidence 619 V2.619: Graviton Mode Count Derivation — The α-δ Asymmetry 620 V2.620: Cosmological Selection of the Standard Model — Why 3 Generations 621 V2.621: Generation Selection from Lambda 623 V2.623: EW Phase Transition Invariance — Ω_Λ Is the Same at Every Epoch 624 V2.624: SM Uniqueness — Exhaustive Field Content Scan 631 V2.631: Species-Dependence Atlas — The Framework's Unique Fingerprint 633 V2.633: Per-Mode Dark Energy Structure and CMB Low-l Implications 634 V2.634: Per-Particle Dark Energy Budget 636 V2.636: Growth Rate f·σ₈(z) — Zero-Parameter Prediction vs DESI DR1 637 V2.637: The QCD Sector as the Anchor of Dark Energy 639 V2.639: Hubble Tension Anatomy — H₀ Diagnosis Within the Framework 640 V2.640: SM Uniqueness from Omega_Lambda + Anomaly Cancellation 641 V2.641: Lambda Counts Colors — Ω_Λ Determines N_c = 3 642 V2.642: End-to-End Lattice Verification of R = 149√π/384 643 V2.643: Phase Transition Invariance — Why Lambda Doesn't Jump 645 V2.645: SM Uniqueness from the Full BSM Landscape 646 V2.646: Precision Double-Limit R = 149sqrt(pi)/384 647 V2.647: Equation of State from Entanglement — Why w = -1 is Exact 648 V2.648: Delta Mass-Independence via Differential Method 649 V2.649: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Most Powerful Unique Prediction 650 V2.650: Mass Invariance of the Trace Anomaly Delta 651 V2.651: BH Entropy Log Correction Staircase — Mass-Dependent Species Activation 652 V2.652: N_eff–Ω_Λ Falsification Corridor 653 V2.653: Two Predictions, Zero Parameters — the (Ω_Λ, γ_BH) Overconstrained Test 654 V2.654: Bayesian BAO Model Comparison — Framework vs ΛCDM vs w₀waCDM 655 V2.655: One Number Predicts Everything 656 V2.656: Neutrino Mass from Lambda — Breaking the Ω_Λ–Σm_ν Degeneracy 657 V2.657: BAO-SN Tension Diagnostic — Why w₀waCDM Is Overfitting 658 V2.658: The Coincidence Problem — Resolved or Reframed? 659 V2.659: Unitarity Requires Dark Energy — The a-Theorem Connection 660 V2.660: Unitarity Requires Dark Energy — The Cosmological Constant Selects N_gen = 3 661 V2.661: GUT Gauge Group Selection — The SM and Trinification Survive, All Standard GUTs Excluded 662 V2.662: Global Evidence Ratio — The Definitive Statistical Assessment 663 V2.663: Global Evidence Ratio — Bayesian Framework vs ΛCDM 664 V2.664: Global Evidence Ratio — Framework BIC-Preferred Over LCDM 665 V2.665: Global Evidence Ratio — Framework Preferred Over LCDM by BF=50 666 V2.666: Precision Interaction Correction — Closing the 0.44% Gap 667 V2.667: Precision Interaction Correction — δ Exact, α Corrected by SM Couplings 668 V2.668: Dark Matter Particle Exclusion from Ω_Λ 669 V2.669: Dark Energy Budget — Which SM Fields Source Ω_Λ? 670 V2.670: BAO Survival Monte Carlo — Framework Ranks Top 28% of Random Cosmologies 671 V2.671: Lambda Phase Transition Invariance — The Goldstone Shield 672 V2.672: Lambda Phase Transition Invariance — The Goldstone Shield 673 V2.673: Species-Dependence Curve — The Particle-Cosmology Bridge 675 V2.675: Species-Dependence Curve — The Particle-Cosmology Bridge 676 V2.676: Precision Prediction Card — The Framework's Final Answer 677 V2.677: Precision Prediction Card — The Framework's Final Answer 678 V2.678: DESI w₀wₐ Model Comparison — Is Evolving Dark Energy Justified? 679 V2.679: SM Selection from the QFT Landscape 680 V2.680: Growth Rate Confrontation — fσ₈(z) as Independent w=-1 Test 681 V2.681: Growth Rate Confrontation — fσ₈(z) Independently Prefers w=-1 683 V2.683: Supernova Distance Modulus Confrontation — The Third Pillar 684 V2.684: CMB Acoustic Scale Test — Shift Parameter R at -0.05σ 687 V2.687: Precision BSM Exclusion Map — Lambda as a Particle Detector 689 V2.689: Joint (N_eff, Ω_Λ) Prediction Corridor — The Two-Observable Smoking Gun 690 V2.690: Black Hole Log Correction — The Quantum Gravity Discriminant 691 V2.691: The Dual Observable Test — One Number Rules BH Physics and Cosmology 692 V2.692: Dual Observable Test — One Number Rules BH Physics and Cosmology 693 V2.693: The Cosmological Constant Problem — Mass-Independence of Delta 694 V2.694: DESI Bayes Factor — Zero Parameters vs w₀wₐCDM 695 V2.695: Per-Species Entanglement Spectrum — The Rainbow Curve 696 V2.696: Precision Prediction Error Budget — How Sharp Is R? 697 V2.697: Graviton Edge Modes — Why n_grav = 10 and What It Means 698 V2.698: Complete Derived Parameters — H₀, σ₈, S₈ from Zero Parameters 699 V2.699: Graviton Mode Count from the Lattice — n_grav = 10 Without Cosmology 700 V2.700: Derived Parameters — Framework vs LCDM on Cosmological Tensions 701 V2.701: Full Cosmological Concordance — Zero Parameters vs ALL Data 702 V2.702: Joint Significance of Six Predictions from One Formula 703 V2.703: Does the Framework Absorb DESI's Evolving Dark Energy Signal? 704 V2.704: Information-Theoretic Model Selection — The Occam Razor 705 V2.705: Gauge Theory Landscape Scan — How Special Is the SM? 706 V2.706: Species-Dependence Curve — Lambda as a Function of Particle Content 707 V2.707: Tension Anatomy — Where the 2.9σ Actually Comes From 708 V2.708: EW Phase Transition Lambda Invariance 709 V2.709: Euclid/CMB-S4 Discrimination Forecast — When Will We Know? 710 V2.710: PBH Hawking Radiation Spectral Fingerprint 711 V2.711: BH Entropy Log Correction as Quantum Gravity Discriminant 712 V2.712: Graviton Mode Count Derivation — n_grav = D(D+1)/2 = 10 713 V2.713: Graviton Screening Precision — What Euclid Will Test 714 V2.714: Omega_Lambda–N_eff Joint Prediction Curve 715 V2.715: The Ω_Λ–N_eff Joint Curve — the Smoking Gun Prediction 716 V2.716: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — The Inverted Hierarchy 717 V2.717: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — the Inverted Hierarchy 718 V2.718: Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation — the Inverted Hierarchy 719 V2.719: The Spin Balance — Why Omega_Lambda ~ 0.7 Is Not a Coincidence 720 V2.720: The Spin Balance — Why Omega_Lambda ~ 0.7 Is Not a Coincidence 721 V2.721: w = -1 Exactly — the Framework's Most Dangerous Prediction 722 V2.722: Global Consistency Scorecard — One Number for the Framework 723 V2.723: Bayesian Model Selection — ln(BF) = +10.7 vs CPL (pre-DESI) 724 V2.724: The (a,c) Decomposition — Two Predictions from One Anomaly 724 V2.724: The (a,c) Decomposition — Two Predictions from One Anomaly 727 V2.727: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Fingerprint 728 V2.728: Multi-Probe BSM Exclusion Map 729 V2.729: CMB Low-Multipole Prediction — Zero-Parameter Entanglement Cosmology 730 V2.730: BH Entropy Log Correction — Two Predictions, Zero Parameters 731 V2.731: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Lambda 732 V2.732: Neutrino Mass from Fixed Lambda — Breaking the OL-mnu Degeneracy 733 V2.733: Dark Energy Selects Three Generations 734 V2.734: EW Phase Transition Lambda Invariance — The CC Problem Solved 735 V2.735: Dual Observable BSM Exclusion Map — Two Predictions, Zero Parameters 744 V2.744: Species-Dependence Curve — The Framework's Unique Prediction 751 V2.751: BH Entropy Log Correction — Quantum Gravity Fingerprint 752 V2.752: GUT Incompatibility Theorem — Lambda Forbids Gauge Unification 753 V2.753: BH Entropy Log Correction — Quantum Gravity Rosetta Stone 756 V2.756: Framework-Allowed Gravitational Wave Window at LISA 757 V2.757: BSM Phase Space Topology — Dark Matter Census 758 V2.758: Horizon Entanglement Spectroscopy — CMB Quadrupole Bound 759 V2.759: Axion-Lambda Connection — Three Problems, One Particle 760 V2.760: Zero-Parameter Bayesian Showdown — Framework vs ΛCDM at the Precision Frontier 768 V2.768: Black Hole Entropy Log Correction — The Standard Model Prediction 769 V2.769: Joint (N_eff, Ω_Λ) Constraint — The Particle Physics ↔ Cosmology Bridge 781 V2.781: EW Vacuum Energy Invariance — The 10^55 Fine-Tuning Test 783 V2.783: Graviton Entanglement Hierarchy — Why n=10 and How Euclid Will Test It
Precision Cosmological Tests
54/54
152 V2.152: Zero-Parameter Precision Cosmology — The Entanglement ΛCDM vs All Data 153 V2.153: The Direct Expansion Rate Test — Cosmic Chronometers Confirm Zero-Parameter Cosmology 154 V2.154: The Theoretical Error Budget — How Robust is Ω_Λ = |δ|/(6α)? 155 V2.155: The Vacuum Energy Non-Gravitation Theorem — From Assumption to Consequence 156 V2.156: The Derivation Audit — Every Link Tested, Every Assumption Exposed 163 V2.163: Observable Predictions and the Falsification Frontier 244 V2.244: Zero-Parameter Cosmological Concordance from Entanglement Lambda 361 V2.361: Sound Horizon & BAO Confrontation 362 V2.362: Multi-Probe Zero-Parameter Concordance 365 V2.365: CMB ISW Effect from Entanglement Dark Energy 366 V2.366: Cosmological Phase Transition Invariance — Lambda as a Topological Invariant 368 V2.368: Black Hole Remnant Mass from Entanglement — Framework vs LQG 371 V2.371: Growth Rate fσ₈(z) from Entanglement Dark Energy 373 V2.373: DESI BAO Confrontation — Bin-by-Bin w = -1 Stress Test 374 V2.374: Joint Bayesian Evidence — BAO + SNe + fσ₈ 376 V2.376: Joint Bayesian Evidence — 47 Data Points, Framework Ties Planck ΛCDM 377 V2.377: SNe Diagnostic & Probe-Separated Bayesian Evidence 378 V2.378: Zero-Parameter H₀ Prediction — The Framework Resolves the Hubble Tension 379 V2.379: Zero-Parameter H₀ Prediction — Framework Resolves the Hubble Tension 380 V2.380: Zero-Parameter H₀ Prediction — Framework Resolves Hubble Tension 382 V2.382: Framework vs Landscape — Bayes Factor 50–10000× Favors Entanglement 387 V2.387: Complete Cosmological Tension Scorecard 391 V2.391: DESI DR1 BAO Confrontation 436 V2.436: DESI BAO Confrontation — Bin-by-Bin Autopsy 438 V2.438: SN Distance-Modulus Autopsy — Where Does the w ≠ -1 Signal Come From? 439 V2.439: Framework H₀ Prediction and the Hubble Tension 441 V2.441: Structure Growth Prediction — f*sigma8(z) from Framework Omega_m 442 V2.442: Global Tension Minimum — Framework Ω_Λ is Preferred by Combined Data 443 V2.443: Why Three Generations — Omega_Lambda Uniquely Selects N_gen = 3 451 V2.451: CMB Low-Multipole Horizon Imprint — Does the Framework Predict the Low Quadrupole? 457 V2.457: Bayesian Evidence — Framework Preferred over ΛCDM (BF = 70) 462 V2.462: Framework vs Evolving Dark Energy — Three-Parameter Occam Test 470 V2.470: Growth Rate and S₈ Tension — Zero-Parameter Structure Formation 520 V2.520: Multi-Probe Stress Test — Ω_Λ = 0.6877 vs All Cosmological Data 535 V2.535: Joint BAO+CMB Optimization — Framework Wins the Combined Test 541 V2.541: Full Derived Concordance at the Framework's Optimal Point 542 V2.542: Bayesian Model Comparison — Framework vs ΛCDM 548 V2.548: DESI DR1 BAO Distance Ladder — Framework Survives 549 V2.549: Pantheon+ Type Ia Supernovae Confrontation 579 V2.579: Zero-Parameter Cosmic Distance Ladder vs DESI Y1 BAO 580 V2.580: Cosmic Concordance — Framework's Zero-Parameter Stance on All 5 Major Tensions 588 V2.588: Multi-Probe Joint Evidence — CMB + BAO + SNe with Zero Free Parameters 596 V2.596: DESI DR1 BAO Confrontation 599 V2.599: Bayesian Model Selection — Framework vs ΛCDM vs w₀w_aCDM 602 V2.602: Tension Autopsy — The V2.599 3σ Was a Methodological Artifact 606 V2.606: Early Dark Energy Trap — The "Loophole" Makes Things Worse 607 V2.607: Zero-Parameter DESI Distance Ladder Confrontation 618 V2.618: SN Ia Distance Modulus + Joint Multi-Probe Confrontation 622 V2.622: Massive Field Trace Anomaly — Does δ Survive Mass Deformation? 625 V2.625: CMB Data Combination Sensitivity — Where Does Ω_Λ Really Sit? 626 V2.626: CMB Data Combination Sensitivity — Framework vs ΛCDM by Bayesian Model Selection 630 V2.630: DESI BAO Confrontation — w=-1 Exactness as Falsification Test 682 V2.682: CMB Acoustic Scale Test — The Most Precise Confrontation 685 V2.685: DESI Y1 BAO Distance Ladder — Bin-by-Bin Confrontation
a-Theorem & Unitarity
1/1
a-Theorem & Λ Positivity
1/1
Dimensional Selection
17/17
170 V2.170: Why 3+1 — Dimensional Selection from Entanglement Thermodynamics 171 V2.171: The Inverse Problem — Measuring Lattice QFT from Planck Data 172 V2.172: Stress Test — The Observation Determines the Theory 173 V2.173: The Dark Energy Census — Each Particle's Contribution and BSM Constraints 174 V2.174: The Equation of State — Why w = -1 Is Not Optional 175 V2.175: The Derivation Audit — Five Links in the Chain 193 V2.193: Dimensional Selection — Why D=4 is the Only Dimension That Predicts Omega_Lambda 385 V2.385: SM Uniqueness from Λ — The Cosmological Constant Selects (N_c=3, N_gen=3) 411 V2.411: Dimensional Scaling of α_s — The Last Analytical Gap 412 V2.412: Verification of α_s(D=5) — The Formula Fails 428 V2.428: Why D=4 — The Trace Anomaly Selects the Spacetime Dimension 544 V2.544: Gauss-Bonnet Topological Protection — Why Λ = |δ|/(2αL_H²) Is Exact 545 V2.545: Lovelock-QNEC Correspondence — Why D=4 Requires Exactly Two Terms 546 V2.546: Gauss-Bonnet Topological Protection — Why D=4 is Unique 547 V2.547: QNEC-Clausius Upgrade — Link 4 Elevated from 2/4 to 3/4 600 V2.600: Heat Kernel Two-Term Theorem — Why d=4 Gives Exactly {G, Λ} 644 V2.644: Dimensional Selection — Why D=4 from Entanglement Structure
Falsifiability and External Tests
4/4
Deriving Λ_bare = 0
65/65
243 V2.243: High-Precision alpha-rho_vac Identity 249 V2.249: Modular Hamiltonian Decomposition — Vacuum Energy as Entanglement 250 V2.250: Clausius Bootstrap — Λ_bare = 0 from QNEC Completeness 251 V2.251: Spectral Double-Counting — Modular and Physical Hamiltonians Share Eigenspaces 252 V2.252: Casimir-Entropy Identity on S³ — Obstruction from Two Anomaly Coefficients 253 V2.253: Two-Horizon Constraint — α and δ as Independent Observables 254 V2.254: Gamma Constant — Finite Part of Entanglement Entropy 255 V2.255: GSL with Nonzero Λ_bare — Second Law Cannot Constrain Λ_bare 256 V2.256: Modular Flow Inconsistency — Λ_bare ≠ 0 Violates BW 257 V2.257: Entropy Functional Completeness — No Room for Λ_bare 258 V2.258: Heat Kernel and Spectral Analysis — Seeley-DeWitt on the Srednicki Lattice 259 V2.259: Heat Kernel / Seeley-DeWitt — Spectral Uniqueness on Lattice 260 V2.260: Bianchi Self-Consistency Fixed Point 261 V2.261: 2+1D Casimir-Entropy — Extending the 1+1D Identity 262 V2.262: Casimir Energy Per Channel on Srednicki Lattice (C.1 + C.3) 263 V2.263: High-Precision α/ρ_vac Functional Identity (B.1 Extension) 264 V2.264: Precision QNEC Verification — Closing the 34% Gap 265 V2.265: Quadratic Identity Validation — V2.263's R²=1.000 is OVERFITTING 267 V2.267: Channel-Resolved QNEC — The Two-Term Structure is Emergent 268 V2.268: QNEC Form Under Mass Deformation 270 V2.270: Thermal State Entanglement — α IS Vacuum-Specific 272 V2.272: QNEC Dimensional Dependence — Λ Determination is D=4 Specific 273 V2.273: Two-Boundary QNEC — Shell Entropy Confirms α Universality 274 V2.274: QNEC Saturation Test — Stress Tensor vs Entropy Derivative 275 V2.275: QNEC Form on Cubic Lattice — Geometry Independence 276 V2.276: Boundary Mode Spectral Identity — Does ν_max Determine ρ_vac? 277 V2.277: Entanglement Equilibrium — Vacuum Is NOT an Entropy Maximum for Arbitrary Perturbations 278 V2.278: Thermal QNEC Form — Does S''(n) = A + B/n² Survive at Finite Temperature? 279 V2.279: Exact Spectral Trace Identity — tr(P) IS the Vacuum Energy 280 V2.280: Perturbative Double-Counting — Exact Correction to tr(P) = ρ_A 281 V2.281: Renyi QNEC Form — Structural Selection of Von Neumann Entropy 282 V2.282: Vacuum Energy Spatial Profile — Boundary vs Bulk Duality in P_sub 284 V2.284: QNEC Finite-Difference Structure — Cutoff Oscillation Dominates 285 V2.285: High-Precision tr(P)/ρ Identity — Approach B Criterion Test 294 V2.294: Renyi QNEC Selection — Von Neumann Uniqueness for Λ_bare = 0 295 V2.295: Matrix Locality Proof of the Double-Counting Identity 296 V2.296: Rényi QNEC Selection 297 V2.297: 2+1D Entropy Identity and Dimensional Selection 299 V2.299: 2+1D Double-Counting Identity — Dimensional Universality 300 V2.300: Heat Kernel Double-Counting Identity 301 V2.301: Massive Double-Counting Identity 302 V2.302: Locality Gap Spectrum — Connecting Double-Counting to Entanglement 303 V2.303: Massive Double-Counting Identity 304 V2.304: Benzi-Golub Spectral Bound on K^{1/2} Localization 305 V2.305: Symplectic Spectral Flow — Per-Mode 2-Parameter Structure 306 V2.306: Symplectic Spectral Flow — Per-Mode QNEC Structure 307 V2.307: Vector (Spin-1) Double-Counting Identity 308 V2.308: QNEC Cancellation Mechanism — Log-Term Sum Rule 309 V2.309: QNEC Cancellation Mechanism — C_k ∝ B_k (Slaved, Not Independent) 310 V2.310: Fermionic Double-Counting Identity 311 V2.311: QNEC Mode Anatomy — UV/IR Phase Transition in Angular Momentum Space 312 V2.312: Per-Channel Trace Anomaly Decomposition 313 V2.313: QNEC Log-Term Cancellation Sum Rule 314 V2.314: SM Double-Counting Precision — Continuum Extrapolation 315 V2.315: Self-Consistency Attractor — Λ_bare = 0 with Curvature-Dependent α, δ 316 V2.316: Analytic Double-Counting Bound via Benzi-Golub Theorem 317 V2.317: QNEC Log Cancellation — The 2-Term Structure Is Exact 318 V2.318: Squeezed-State QNEC — State Independence of Gravitational Constants 319 V2.319: Multi-Field QNEC Completeness 320 V2.320: Multi-Field QNEC Completeness — 2-Term Structure Across SM Spectrum 321 V2.321: QNEC Log Cancellation Sum Rule 322 V2.322: QNEC Finite-Size Scaling — Does 2-Term Become Exact as N,C → ∞? 323 V2.323: Total QNEC State Independence Under Squeezing 324 V2.322: QNEC Finite-Size Scaling 335 V2.335: The Cosmological Constant Problem — Quantitative Dissolution
Next
-- Agent is designing the next experiment...