V2.365 - CMB ISW Effect from Entanglement Dark Energy
V2.365: CMB ISW Effect from Entanglement Dark Energy
Status: SUCCESS (26/26 tests pass) Date: 2026-03-10 Category: Precision Cosmological Tests — CMB Low-Multipole Predictions
Headline
The framework predicts the ISW-galaxy cross-correlation amplitude A_ISW = 1.020 with zero free parameters, determined entirely by SM field content + graviton. This is consistent with DES × Planck measurement (1.0 ± 0.3) at 0.1σ. At Euclid × CMB-S4 precision (~5%), this becomes a sharp discriminator between particle physics models.
Scientific Question
The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect is the only late-time CMB signal that depends directly on Λ. If Λ = |δ_total|/(2α_total L_H²) as the framework predicts, then the ISW amplitude is a calculable function of the Standard Model field content. Can this be used as a unique test?
Method
- CMB Power Spectrum: Computed D_l = l(l+1)C_l/(2π) for l = 2–30 using the large-angle SW + ISW formula with Eisenstein-Hu transfer function
- Three cosmologies compared: Framework (Ω_Λ = 0.6877), LCDM best-fit (Ω_Λ = 0.6847), SM-only (Ω_Λ = 0.6646)
- ISW decomposition: Separated SW, ISW, and cross-correlation contributions
- Species scan: Computed A_ISW for 8 field content scenarios
- Forecasts: Projected discriminating power for Euclid × CMB-S4
Important caveat: The computation uses a simplified SW+ISW formula without a full Boltzmann solver (CAMB/CLASS). Absolute D_l values are approximate (~30% high due to missing acoustic oscillation corrections at intermediate k). Relative comparisons between cosmologies are robust since the same approximation applies to all.
Key Results
1. ISW Amplitude — Zero-Parameter Prediction
| Model | Ω_Λ | A_ISW | Tension (current) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SM + grav (n=10) | 0.6877 | 1.020 | 0.1σ |
| SM + 1 axion | 0.6830 | 0.989 | 0.0σ |
| SM + 1 sterile ν | 0.6805 | 0.974 | 0.1σ |
| SM + grav (f_g=61/212) | 0.6716 | 0.920 | 0.3σ |
| SM (no grav) | 0.6646 | 0.880 | 0.4σ |
| SM + dark photon | 0.7147 | 1.215 | 0.7σ |
| SM + grav TT (n=2) | 0.7336 | 1.378 | 1.3σ |
| MSSM | 0.3584 | 0.123 | 2.9σ |
The framework’s A_ISW = 1.020 is essentially perfect — the ISW signal encoded in galaxy-CMB cross-correlations matches what the SM predicts.
2. Low-Multipole Power Spectrum
At l = 2–30, the framework and LCDM best-fit are virtually indistinguishable:
- Framework: χ²/N = 5.39
- LCDM: χ²/N = 5.39
- SM-only: χ²/N = 5.42
The ΔΩ_Λ = 0.003 between framework and LCDM translates to < 1% change in D_l.
3. The Quadrupole: Honest Null Result
- Observed D_2 = 150 μK² (anomalously low)
- Predicted D_2 ≈ 1200–1500 μK² (both framework and LCDM)
- Tension: ~1.4σ (cosmic variance σ ≈ 63% of mean at l = 2)
- Assessment: The framework does NOT predict the low quadrupole. This is a ≤2σ cosmic variance fluctuation, identical in both frameworks.
4. ISW Fraction by Multipole
The ISW contribution to D_l decreases with l:
- l = 2: ISW ~ 39% of total (late-time potential decay dominates)
- l = 10: ISW ~ 14%
- l = 20: ISW ~ 6%
- l = 30: ISW ~ 3%
This ISW fraction is the species-dependent part: changing particle content shifts it.
5. Experimental Forecasts
Euclid × CMB-S4 (σ(A_ISW) ≈ 0.05, ~2030):
| Model | A_ISW | Future tension |
|---|---|---|
| SM + grav (n=10) | 1.020 | 0.4σ ✓ |
| SM (no grav) | 0.880 | 2.4σ ✗ |
| SM + dark photon | 1.215 | 4.3σ ✗✗ |
| SM + 1 sterile ν | 0.974 | 0.5σ ✓ |
At Euclid precision, the ISW becomes a particle detector: dark photon excluded at >4σ, SM without graviton at >2σ.
CMB-S4 alone (σ(Ω_Λ) ≈ 0.003):
- Framework tension: 1.0σ (if Planck central value unchanged)
- Decisive test requires central value convergence
What This Means
Three Unique CMB Predictions (No Other Framework Makes These)
- Ω_Λ = 0.6877 from particle physics — not a fit parameter
- A_ISW = 1.020 from SM field content — the ISW-galaxy cross-correlation amplitude is predicted with zero free parameters
- Species-dependent ISW — adding a dark photon shifts A_ISW by 19%, adding a sterile neutrino shifts by 4.5%, both detectable at Euclid precision
What the Framework Does NOT Predict
- The low quadrupole — this remains a cosmic variance anomaly
- The hemispherical asymmetry — requires physics beyond horizon entanglement
- Acoustic peak details — the framework doesn’t modify sub-horizon physics (w = -1, standard expansion history)
The Key Insight
The ISW effect at low multipoles is the ONLY late-time CMB signal sensitive to Λ. In ΛCDM, the ISW amplitude is a free parameter (through Ω_Λ). In this framework, it’s determined by counting SM fields. This converts the ISW from a cosmological observable into a particle physics diagnostic.
Limitations
- Simplified SW+ISW computation without full Boltzmann solver — absolute D_l values approximate
- Eisenstein-Hu transfer function (no baryon wiggles) — adequate for l < 30
- ISW fraction overestimated at l = 2 due to missing acoustic corrections at intermediate k
- Relative comparisons between cosmologies are robust; absolute values should be verified with CAMB
Files
src/cmb_isw.py: Core physics (growth function, ISW integral, species predictions)tests/test_cmb_isw.py: 26 tests covering all modulesrun_experiment.py: Full experiment with 8 analysis sectionsresults.json: Machine-readable output
Verdict
The framework makes three unique, testable CMB predictions connecting particle physics to the ISW effect. The current ISW measurement (A_ISW = 1.0 ± 0.3) is consistent with the framework’s prediction (1.020). Euclid × CMB-S4 (~2030) will sharpen this to a 5% test, capable of excluding the dark photon at 4.3σ and the graviton-free SM at 2.4σ. The low CMB quadrupole remains unexplained by both the framework and ΛCDM.