Experiments / V2.89
V2.89
Cosmological Prediction COMPLETE

Self-Consistent Lambda from R(mu) Crossover

Experiment V2.89: Self-Consistent Lambda from R(mu) Crossover

Status: COMPLETE

Summary

The self-consistency ratio R(mu) = |delta(mu)|/(12alpha(mu)) varies with energy scale mu as SM species decouple below their mass thresholds. At high mu (all species active), R_UV = 0.329. At low mu (photon only), R_IR = 1.205. Since R must cross 1 somewhere, this experiment finds the crossover scale mu and asks: does H = mu* give the observed cosmological constant?

Key Result: Crossover Exists but Lambda Prediction Fails

R(mu) crosses 1 at mu* ~ 0.02 eV (near the neutrino mass scale), but the naive identification H = mu* gives Lambda/Lambda_obs ~ 10^63 — approximately 60 orders of magnitude too large.

Phase 1: R(mu) at Key Scales

Scalemu (eV)R(mu)Active species
Hubble1.5e-331.2051 (photon)
Neutrino0.050.6301 (photon + partial nu)
Electron5.11e50.3364
QCD2.0e80.27626
Top1.73e110.33255
Planck1.22e280.32961 (all SM)

R is non-monotonic: it dips to a minimum ~0.276 at the QCD scale (where 8 gluons activate, adding large alpha with relatively small delta), then rises back to ~0.329 at the top/Planck scale.

Phase 2: Crossover Analysis

Suppression modellog10(mu*)mu* (eV)R at crossing
Exponential-1.710.01951.000
Boltzmann-1.510.0311.000
Smooth step-1.840.0141.000
Step function-1.300.0501.000
Lattice-3.562.8e-41.000

The crossover is robust: it exists for all suppression models, though the exact scale varies by ~2 decades (dominated by the lattice model outlier). The exponential, Boltzmann, and smooth-step models agree to within 0.5 decades.

Phase 3: Lambda Prediction

For the exponential model crossover at mu* = 0.0195 eV:

QuantityValue
H = mu*/M_Planck1.60e-30 (Planck units)
Lambda = 3*H^27.64e-60 (Planck units)
Lambda_obs1.1e-122 (Planck units)
Lambda/Lambda_obs6.95e62
log10(Lambda/Lambda_obs)62.8

The predicted Lambda overshoots by ~63 orders of magnitude. The crossover scale (~0.02 eV, near neutrino masses) is enormously larger than the actual Hubble parameter (~1.5e-33 eV).

Phase 4: Physical Interpretation

The R(mu) = 1 crossover is physically meaningful: it marks the scale where the entanglement entropy exactly satisfies self-consistency. However, the naive identification mu = H (energy scale = expansion rate) fails catastrophically.

Possible resolutions:

  1. The relevant mu is not H but some other cosmological scale
  2. The mapping from mu to Lambda involves running of G or other couplings
  3. Self-consistency should be imposed at the Planck scale, not at R=1
  4. The factor-of-3 gap is an artifact of using free-field entropy coefficients

Phase 5: R(mu) Landscape

The R(mu) landscape reveals that the QCD phase transition is the dominant feature: gluon activation drives R down to 0.276, and the slow recovery through heavy quarks and W/Z/Higgs brings it back to 0.329. The neutrino-scale crossing at R=1 is a consequence of neutrino decoupling tipping the balance between delta (dominated by vectors at low mu) and alpha.

Files

FileDescription
src/species_database.pySM species list, masses, alpha/delta per type, suppression functions
src/r_mu_crossover.pyR(mu) computation and crossover finder
src/lambda_prediction.pyLambda prediction from crossover scale
tests/test_r_mu.py12 tests (all pass)
run_experiment.py5-phase driver