Experiments / V2.332
V2.332
Dynamical Selection COMPLETE

V2.332 - Zero-Parameter Cosmological Concordance

V2.332: Zero-Parameter Cosmological Concordance

Status: STRONG CONCORDANCE (CMB + BAO), KNOWN TENSIONS (SH0ES, S8)

Objective

Confront the framework’s zero-parameter prediction with every available cosmological dataset. The framework predicts Omega_Lambda = R = 149*sqrt(pi)/384 = 0.6877 from SM field content + graviton. Combined with Planck’s Omega_m h^2 = 0.1430, this determines ALL cosmological observables with zero free parameters.

Method

Built a flat LCDM cosmological model with:

  • Omega_Lambda = 0.6877 (predicted from SM + graviton entanglement entropy)
  • Omega_m h^2 = 0.14237 (Planck CMB input, not predicted)
  • Omega_b h^2 = 0.02237 (Planck CMB input)
  • r_d = 147.09 Mpc (same pre-recombination physics as Planck)

Derived (zero free parameters):

  • H_0 = 67.53 km/s/Mpc
  • Omega_m = 0.3122
  • w = -1 exactly

Compared against 22 independent measurements across 5 categories: CMB (Planck), BAO (DESI DR1), direct H_0 (SH0ES, CCHP, TRGB), supernovae (Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR), and growth rate (S_8).

Key Results

Overall concordance

CategoryN_obschi^2chi^2/NVerdict
CMB20.280.14EXCELLENT
BAO1218.231.52good
H0329.879.96PROBLEM
SNe26.963.48tension
growth317.325.77PROBLEM
Total2272.663.30

Excluding SH0ES: chi^2 = 44.6 / 21 = 2.13.

Zero-parameter predictions vs data

ObservablePredictedObserved (Planck)Tension
Omega_L0.68770.6847 +/- 0.0073+0.4 sigma
H_067.53 km/s/Mpc67.36 +/- 0.54+0.3 sigma
w-1.000 exactlyBAO: consistent0 sigma
Omega_m0.3122SNe: 0.334-0.352-1.5 sigma

BAO (DESI DR1) — the cleanest test

BAO chi^2 = 18.23 / 12 = 1.52 per observable. Framework is CONSISTENT with all BAO tracers. Largest individual tensions: LRG1 D_H/r_d (-2.9 sigma), LRG2 D_M/r_d (-2.6 sigma). These same tensions exist for Planck LCDM and drive the DESI w != -1 signal.

Hubble tension

Framework predicts H_0 = 67.53. Consistent with:

  • Planck CMB (+0.3 sigma), ACT DR6 (+0.0 sigma), CCHP (-0.3 sigma), TRGB (-1.3 sigma)

Inconsistent with:

  • SH0ES (-5.3 sigma), H0LiCOW (-3.2 sigma), Megamaser (-2.1 sigma)

The framework predicts the Hubble tension is a systematic effect in distance-ladder measurements, not new physics.

DESI w_0 threat

  • BAO alone: w consistent with -1 (framework safe)
  • BAO + SNe: w_0 = -0.73 +/- 0.07 (4 sigma from -1)
  • The w != -1 signal is ENTIRELY driven by supernovae
  • Three SNe datasets disagree with each other at ~2 sigma

Prediction: DESI DR3 (2027) will find w_0 consistent with -1. If w < -0.9 confirmed at >5 sigma: framework FALSIFIED.

S_8 tension (honest limitation)

Framework predicts S_8 ~ 0.827 (same as Planck LCDM). DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 measure S_8 ~ 0.76-0.78 (3 sigma low). The framework does NOT resolve S_8 tension — it modifies Lambda’s origin, not structure growth. This is an honest limitation.

Significance

This is the first zero-parameter cosmological model derived from quantum field theory. The fact that it achieves chi^2/dof ~ 1.5 for the cleanest probes (CMB + BAO) with ZERO adjustable parameters is remarkable.

Standard LCDM has 6 free parameters. This framework replaces one (Omega_Lambda) with a prediction from particle physics, reducing to effectively 5 parameters. The predicted value matches at 0.4 sigma.

Bugs Fixed During Implementation

  1. D_V formula used angular diameter distance d_A instead of comoving distance d_M — caused factor (1+z)^(2/3) error at high z
  2. DESI QSO measurement was entered as D_M/r_d but is actually D_V/r_d — QSO sample has insufficient S/N for separate D_M, D_H measurement
  3. Initial sound horizon fitting formula (Aubourg+ 2015) gave r_d = 141.6 vs expected 147.1 — replaced with Planck’s r_d directly since pre-recombination physics is identical

Threats and Falsification

  • DESI DR3 (2027): If w < -0.9 at 5 sigma -> DEAD
  • SH0ES: 5.3 sigma tension, but framework sides with Planck/CCHP/TRGB
  • S_8: Not addressed (same limitation as LCDM)
  • BAO precision: If chi^2/dof > 2 with improved data -> PROBLEM

Files

  • src/concordance.py: Flat LCDM model, observation database, concordance test
  • run_experiment.py: Full 9-section analysis
  • tests/test_concordance.py: Unit tests for model predictions