Experiments / V2.460
V2.460
Closing the Lambda Gap COMPLETE

V2.460 - Spin-Dependent Area Coefficient — α Universal to <0.02% Across Spins

V2.460: Spin-Dependent Area Coefficient — α Universal to <0.02% Across Spins

Status: COMPLETE — α universality confirmed in the double limit

The Question

The framework assumes α_s is the SAME for all field types (scalar, vector, graviton). This lets us write N_eff = 128, summing all SM components equally. V2.271 tested this at individual C values but never took the (n→∞, C→∞) double limit separately for each spin. Does universality survive the continuum limit?

Method

  1. Compute the α grid on (n, C) = {6,8,10,12,15} × {2,3,4,5,6} for each l_min:
    • l_min = 0 (scalar): all angular momenta
    • l_min = 1 (vector): l ≥ 1 only
    • l_min = 2 (graviton TT): l ≥ 2 only
  2. Extract α from second differences: d²S/(8π)
  3. Extrapolate C → ∞ then n → ∞ (double limit)
  4. Compare ratios: α_vector/α_scalar, α_graviton/α_scalar

Key Results

Convergence of Ratios (Phase 5)

The ratio α_graviton/α_scalar converges toward 1.0 as n,C increase:

nC=2C=3C=4C=5C=6
61.0381.0321.0291.0281.027
81.0231.0191.0181.0171.017
101.0151.0131.0121.0111.011
121.0111.0091.0081.0081.008
151.0071.0061.0061.0051.005

Clear 1/n² convergence toward 1.0 at all C values.

Double-Limit Results

Spinl_minα_∞Ratio to scalarDeviation
Scalar00.0248851.000000
Vector10.0248861.000023+0.002%
Graviton20.0248911.000226+0.023%

α is universal across all spins to 0.02% in the double limit.

Why the Finite-n Deviation is Large

At C=4, n=6: graviton α is 2.9% above scalar. This is because:

  • The graviton sum starts at l=2, missing l=0 and l=1
  • At small n, these low-l modes still contribute ~3% of the total
  • As n→∞, the l=0,1 contribution becomes negligible (~1/n²)
  • The l≥2 and l≥0 sums converge to the same per-component α

This is exactly the mechanism predicted by V2.287: α is dominated by the HIGH-l UV tail where all spins produce identical entanglement structure.

Impact on Ω_Λ Prediction

The spin-dependent correction to N_eff is:

N_eff_weighted = (4+90)×1.000 + 24×1.000023 + 10×1.000226 = 128.003

This shifts R by: ΔR/R = ΔN_eff/N_eff = 0.003/128 = 0.002%

In terms of Ω_Λ: shift = 0.00002 (negligible vs σ = 0.0073)

The prediction R = 149√π/384 is robust against spin-dependent corrections.

Note on Absolute α Convergence

The double-limit α = 0.02489 is 5.9% above the exact 1/(24√π) = 0.02351. This is a known lattice-convergence issue at n ≤ 15, C ≤ 6. V2.184 at n ≤ 20, C ≤ 8 achieved 0.01% convergence. The RATIOS converge much faster than the absolute values because systematic lattice artifacts cancel.

What This Means

  1. α_s is universal: the per-component area coefficient is spin-independent in the continuum limit, confirming the framework’s core assumption
  2. N_eff = 128 is correct: no spin-weighted correction needed
  3. The convergence mechanism is clear: high-l modes dominate α, and all spins produce identical entanglement at high l
  4. Finite-n deviations are understood: they follow 1/n² scaling and vanish in the double limit

Files

  • src/spin_alpha_double_limit.py — Srednicki lattice, alpha extraction, double-limit extrapolation
  • tests/test_spin_alpha.py — 9 tests, all passing
  • run_experiment.py — 7-phase experiment
  • results.json — Machine-readable output