V2.527 - Neutrino Mass Prediction from Lambda
V2.527: Neutrino Mass Prediction from Lambda
Motivation
The framework predicts Ω_Λ = 149√π/384 = 0.6877 with zero free parameters. In ΛCDM, Σm_ν and Ω_Λ are degenerate in CMB data — increasing neutrino mass can be partially compensated by decreasing Ω_Λ. The framework breaks this degeneracy by fixing Ω_Λ, yielding a tighter constraint on neutrino mass.
Combined with oscillation data (NuFIT 5.3), this produces a complete prediction for the neutrino mass spectrum — something ΛCDM cannot do.
Method
-
Compute mass eigenvalues from oscillation data (Δm²₂₁, Δm²₃₁) as functions of the lightest mass m_lightest, for both normal (NH) and inverted (IH) hierarchies.
-
Derive the framework’s upper bound on Σm_ν by breaking the Σm_ν−Ω_Λ degeneracy. With Ω_Λ fixed, ~40% of the Planck Σm_ν uncertainty is removed, tightening the 95% CL bound from 120 meV to ~93 meV.
-
Determine hierarchy preference: IH minimum (99 meV) exceeds the framework bound (93 meV) → IH excluded at 95% CL.
-
Compute the allowed mass range for NH, cosmological parameters (H₀, age), and effective Majorana mass m_ββ.
Key Results
1. Framework Predicts Normal Hierarchy
| Hierarchy | Minimum Σm_ν | Framework bound (95% CL) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 59 meV | 93 meV | ALLOWED |
| Inverted | 99 meV | 93 meV | EXCLUDED |
IH is excluded because its minimum Σm_ν (99 meV) exceeds the framework’s upper bound (93 meV). The margin is only 6 meV — a firm but not overwhelming exclusion.
2. Predicted Mass Spectrum (NH)
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| m₁ (lightest) | [0, 19] | meV |
| m₂ | [8.6, 20.6] | meV |
| m₃ (heaviest) | [50.1, 53.5] | meV |
| Σm_ν | [59, 93] | meV |
| m_ββ (Majorana) | [3.7, 20] | meV |
The degeneracy-breaking analysis (Phase 9) shows the framework’s best-fit is at the NH floor: Σm_ν ≈ 59 meV, m₁ ≈ 0.
3. Cosmological Parameters
At Σm_ν = 59 meV (NH minimum):
- H₀ = 67.68 km/s/Mpc
- Ω_m = 0.3123
- Age = 13.773 Gyr
These shift by <0.5% across the allowed Σm_ν range.
4. Experimental Tests
| Experiment | Observable | Sensitivity | Year | Framework prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUNO | Hierarchy | 3σ NH vs IH | 2027 | NH |
| DESI Y5 + CMB | Σm_ν | < 40 meV (95%) | 2028 | 59 meV (detection) |
| CMB-S4 + DESI | Σm_ν | < 20 meV (95%) | 2030 | 59 meV (2.9σ detection) |
| LEGEND-1000 | m_ββ | < 15 meV | 2030 | 3.7 meV (below reach) |
| nEXO | m_ββ | < 7 meV | 2032 | 3.7 meV (below reach) |
5. Kill Conditions
- IH confirmed by JUNO → framework falsified
- Σm_ν > 93 meV detected → exceeds framework bound
- Dirac neutrinos confirmed → framework requires Majorana (V2.326)
- 4th neutrino species (N_eff > 3.1) → breaks Ω_Λ prediction
What This Means
The framework extends its predictive reach from cosmology into particle physics. From a single formula (Ω_Λ = 149√π/384), combined with neutrino oscillation data, it predicts:
- Normal hierarchy (IH excluded at 95% CL)
- Σm_ν ≈ 59 meV (at the oscillation minimum, m₁ ≈ 0)
- Majorana neutrinos (from V2.326)
- m_ββ ≈ 3.7 meV (below next-generation 0νββ experiments)
These predictions are testable by 2030. ΛCDM makes none of them.
Caveats
-
The 40% degeneracy fraction is an estimate. A full MCMC with Planck likelihoods would give a more precise bound. The IH exclusion margin (6 meV) is narrow enough that this matters.
-
The framework assumes 3 Majorana neutrinos (from V2.326). If this assumption is wrong, the mass predictions change.
-
The Σm_ν−Ω_Λ degeneracy slope (−8 eV⁻¹) is approximate. The true degeneracy direction in the Planck posterior is more complex.
-
m_ββ depends on Majorana phases which are unknown. The quoted range assumes maximal constructive interference; the minimum could be lower.